PUBLIC SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE — no real participant or pilot. The private label below describes the report default, not a confidentiality claim about this constructed example.

Return to the guide

Evidence supports a bounded engineering step

PRIVATE working record; review permission and identifying content before sharing.

SYNTHETIC-LOW-001 · Fictional advisor intake · 0.1-rc.4-candidate.2

Engineering recommendation only. Owner authorization and deployment evaluation are separate.

DecisionProfile neededRiskFirst stop
PROCEED_TO_ENGINEERINGQUICK6lowNot recorded

Do next

Does the named owner authorize this exact bounded engineering step?

Owner: engineering lead. Record the owner's separate dated authorization or refusal and conditions. Do not infer authorization from a gate pass.

Six gates - no combined score

Gate and criteriaResultWhat is missing or failed
Understand today's work (HCAI-1.2)PASSRequired checks passed
Name the need and success condition (HCAI-1.1, HCAI-1.3)PASSRequired checks passed
Walk through normal work, failure and recovery (HCAI-3.1, HCAI-3.2)PASSRequired checks passed
Inspect why each artifact belongs (HCAI-2.1, HCAI-2.2, HCAI-2.3)PASSRequired checks passed
Count the work AI leaves or creates (HCAI-3.3)PASSRequired checks passed
Bound the engineering decision (HCAI-4.1, HCAI-4.2, HCAI-4.3, HCAI-4.4, HCAI-4.5)PASSRequired checks passed

PASS means the required upstream evidence is present. MISSING means gather evidence. FAIL means repair a known problem. NOT_EVALUATED means no conclusion was drawn.

Keep these results separate

ResultValueInterpretation
Gross labor minutes saved / case15.0Before AI-output oversight
Oversight minutes / case5.0Review + correction + escalation + rework
Net labor minutes saved / case10.0Projected; not measured performance
Net operating benefit / period470.0USD / month; PROJECTED
Preparation elapsed minutes0.0Outside the short session, never hidden
Review session elapsed minutes12.0Includes capture/reporting
Total evaluation person-minutes24.0Disjoint preparation + evaluator + participant + adjudication
Protocol evaluation cost12.0USD
Operational system performancenot_collectedNo deployment decision is made by this instrument

Missing values are not zero. Money and time are scenario estimates unless separately observed. Evaluation expense is not workflow operating cost.

Current workflow - observed versus reported

StepRole and actionNext / endpointBasis
C1intake advisor: Read and check intakeC2, C4observed
C2intake advisor: Ask for correctionC3reported
C3intake advisor: Correct saved fields or retain cancelled recordC4reported
C4intake lead: Confirm or close intakeEndpointobserved

Inspect requirement -> artifact -> check

R1: Correct or cancel without data loss

Success condition: All three paths preserve the defined fields

Behavior shown: simulated; this label is not inferred from visual fidelity.

Form: Review form with editable fields | Fit: Advisor intake workflow and email dependency | Function: Preserve details through correction/cancel

Reference records: E1

Artifact E1 · version fixture-1 · SHA-256 87a35fd15180404eedfd92f7c23b7afc6e35d8309ff1af4581ec356baaf2a5c7

Check T1: Stipulated three-path walkthrough | walkthrough | pass | tested revision matches: True

Bounded owner decision

Owner: engineering lead

Engineering step: Build a disposable intake prototype

Resource cap: One engineer-day; no live sending

Revisit trigger: Review after prototype walkthrough

Owner authorization: pending separate dated record. A recommendation alone does not permit deployment.

Provenance and limits

Versions: protocol 0.1-rc.4-candidate.2; mcp 0.2.0rc2; skill 0.2.0-rc.2; contract 0.2.0-rc.2

Input SHA-256: 45a69150f572b0ef52393001c86dd0eaa997a82614dfdc81c03b70665e81624f

Previous run: Not recorded; revision: Not recorded

Evidence digests are supplied and structurally checked, not independently fetched or authenticated. Practitioner correspondence and software tests do not establish empirical effectiveness.